Legal Opinion

Dana Snokhous v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided May 14, 2010No. 03-08-00797-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00797-CR

Dana Snokhous, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NO. 08-02786-1, HONORABLE SUZANNE BROOKS, JUDGE PRESIDING

C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N

The majority concludes that appellant does not present reversible error because the two errors complained of were harmless. Although I do not necessarily disagree with the majority's harmless error analysis, I would in the first instance address whether error is presented.

The first point of error challenges the admissibility of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dyar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Russo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  3. Dyar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API