Legal Opinion

Persky v. Wolicki Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1926No. Appeal, 9PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaeeer,

Defendants appeal from a decree of specific performance directing them to execute a deed to plaintiff for certain real estate which the chancellor found they had undertaken to convey by articles.

Appellants do not deny that they had agreed to convey part of the property which they owned; their contention is that they are not bound to convey all of it. The learned chancellor found otherwise and that they must convey the property in its entirety. His conclusion has our assent.

The writing stipulated that defendants, for the consideration of $22,900, would convey to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shaw v. CornmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Cohen v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Lawyer v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Suchan Et Ux. v. SwopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API