State v. Mason

*112¶ 1 Christopher Mason appeals a judgment convicting him of identity theft under *113WIS. STAT. § 943.201,1 as that crime is applied to the use of another's credit or debit card without authorization. Mason argues that the trial evidence was insufficient with *79respect to the "representing" element of identity theft, that is, that Mason represented that he was the cardholder or that he was acting with the authorization of the cardholder.

¶ 2 Although Mason argues insufficiency of the trial evidence, he is not asking us to compare the evidence against elements of a crime with undisputed meaning.…