Legal Opinion

Waleski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 1983No. Appeal, No. 1984 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Peter Waleski (Claimant) appeals the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), affirming the referee’s determination that payment of compensation should be terminated.

Claimant had been employed by Times Mirror Magazine (Employer) for nine years. The record shows that Claimant was injured at work on July 12, 1979 while attempting to pick up a carton from the floor, was treated for lower back pain, had x-rays taken on July 13,1979, and continued to receive medical tratment for back pain. Claimant received compensation benefits following this injury.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brayo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Mickles v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Costanzo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Roberts v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ruhl v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Ruhl v. WCAB (ERIE CO. G. CEN.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API