Jewell v. Weed
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the district court for Renville county, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court .
Berry, J.
The demurrer which was interposed in this case specifies two grounds of objection to the complaint, viz.: First — That the plaintiff has no legal capacity to sue. Second — That the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. We will consider the second ground only, as in our opinion it is well taken and goes to the merits of this controversy.
The complaint alleges that the county of Renville is a duly organized county, and the defendants its duly qualified officers ; that the county seat of said county, though never definitely or…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Shellenberger v. RansomNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- State Ex Rel. Yapp v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Peach v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Wann v. Northwestern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Elton v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.