Legal Opinion
Camp v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 30, 1923No. 3901PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYAN, Circuit Judge.
The Alien Property Custodian filed a petition in the District Court, alleging that on February 22, 1918, the plaintiffs in error, in compliance with section 7 (c) of the Trading with the Enemy Act (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, _ § 3115%d), reported to the Alien Property Custodian that they were indebted to Schilmann & Bene upon notes and upon open account; that on June 11, 1918, the Alien Property Custodian, after investigation, determined that Schilmann & Bene were enemies within the meaning of the Trading with the Enemy Act, and demanded the payment to him…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Stoehr v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- In re MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- American Exch. Nat. Bank v. GarvanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Columbia Brewing Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clark v. Manufacturers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Clark v. Manufacturers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948