Legal Opinion

People v. Hall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1990No. 85050, (Calendar No. 11)PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Defendant was bound over for trial to face felony charges on the basis of hearsay testimony erroneously admitted at the preliminary examination. Although it appears that the ensuing trial was fair and error free, the Court of Appeals determined that this error compelled automatic reversal of defendant’s conviction. We disagree. Concluding that a harmless error analysis is appli*601cable,1 we hold that such an evidentiary deficiency at the preliminary examination is not ground for vacating a subsequent conviction where the defendant received a fair trial and was not otherwise prejudiced by the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. People v. MatuszakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. GravesMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. GillisMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. YostMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API