Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 23, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Habí, J.,

(after stating the facts). The statute of frauds with regard to trusts in real property was enacted to preserve the title to such property from, the uncertainty and'fraud attending the admission of. parol, evidence. It is well settled in this State that a, mere refusal to perform a parol agreement, void under .the .statute, of, frauds, is not of itself fraud. The reason is that the jurisdiction of courts of equity in such cases is founded upon the fraud aid not upon the agreement. It has been well said that the statute of frauds would be worse than waste paper if a breach of promise…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bray v. TimmsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Barron v. StuartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Moore v. OatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bolin v. Drainage District No. 17Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. McCombs v. McCombsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. S. & M. Oil Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  5. George v. DonohueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API