Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Carlon

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 9, 1987No. 67544PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EHRLICH, Justice.

This disciplinary proceeding is before us on a complaint by The Florida Bar and the contested report of the referee. We have jurisdiction, article V, section 15, Florida Constitution.

The facts underlying the bar’s complaint involves Carlon’s association with attorney Marie Hotaling in her representation of the Tam-O-Shanter Condominium Association.1 Hotaling took Carlon to a meeting of the newly elected association board and introduced Carlon as an expert in condominium law. Each of the three board members testified at the hearing before the referee below that they informed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Florida Bar v. HotalingSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The Florida Bar v. CarlonSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API