Legal Opinion

Luman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1919No. 5577PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

—Appellant was convicted of manslaughter and allotted five years in the penitentiary.

It is unnecessary to make a statement of the case in reference to the facts. The question presented for revision involve misconduct of the jury and argument of one of State’s counsel. With reference to the argument of the prosecuting officer, it may be sufficient to say for this appeal that it is disposed of upon the statement that such argument should not occur upon another trial. This is said in view of the fact that the case will he reversed upon the misconduct of the jury.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. McDougal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Horn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Weaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Gilbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Suddath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API