Glover v. Henry

This case involves two separate and distinct points of law. The first point was obviously raised to divert attention from the second point which is the gravaman of this lawsuit. Certainty I agree with the majority opinion relative to point one.

Point two urged by appellant for reversal is as follows :

“The lower court erred in holding that persons appointed to serve on the school boards, to fill vacancies created as the result of recall, pursuant to Act 9 of 1958, Acts of Arkansas, were appointed to serve only until the next annual school election, at which time the unexpired terms of the…