Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sweeney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1925No. Appeal, 229PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is an escheat proceeding certified by the orphans’ court to the common pleas, in which the court gave binding instructions to the jury in favor of the Commonwealth. Catherine Sweeney, now Catherine Davidson, who claims relationship with the deceased Sarah Sweeney and who traversed the finding of the orphans’ court that the property of the decedent had escheated, prosecutes this appeal.

Sarah Sweeney died intestate in March, 1918, aged about seventy-six years.- The questions certified were: Did she leave heirs or next of kin? If she did, is appellant one of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aalholm v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Sitler v. GehrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  3. Sailor v. HertzoggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
  4. Patterson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Haupt v. HenningerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Link's Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Garner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Reno v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Link's Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API