Legal Opinion
State v. Loomis
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 5, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 89 N. J. L. 8.
1Opinion of the Court
*217Tlie opinion of Hie court was delivered by
Parker, J.
But for tlie claim advanced by counsel that tlie Supreme Court “did not refer to or dispose of tlie principal objection raised to the judgment of conviction,” it would in all probability be unnecessary to add anything to the opinion of that court.
The point made is this: That whereas plaintiffs in error maintained that under the statute (section 119 of the Crimes act, quoted in State v. Mandeville, 89 N. J. L. 228; 98 Atl. Rep. 398) it was incumbent on the state to show in a prosecution for abortion, or attempted abortion, that the female was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
- State v. MandevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hans v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Leffingwell v. SUPERIOR COURT NO. 2Indiana Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. SudolNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- State v. ColmerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Gleitman v. CosgroveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967