Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Peterson

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 9, 1979PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

1. After the rape complainant had given her testimony and been excused, the prosecution put in evidence a hospital report which stated, in part, that a physical examination conducted two hours after the alleged rapes disclosed the presence of a “few non-motile sperm” in her vagina. The defendant then moved to have the complainant recalled to the stand for the stated purpose of putting questions to her concerning other sexual activity which might explain the presence of the sperm. The denial of that motion is assigned as error. The defendant gave an *856alibi, but the defense at no time conceded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GouveiaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. McKayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. HicksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. DuffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. StephensMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API