Legal Opinion

Honomichl v. Modlin

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1991No. 17329Published

1Opinion of the Court

477 N.W.2d 599 (1991)

Ben HONOMICHL and Susan Honomichl, d/b/a Custom Sales, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Roger MODLIN, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 17329.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Considered on Briefs September 9, 1991.

Decided November 20, 1991.

Wanda Howey-Fox of Harmelink & Fox Law Office, Yankton, for plaintiff and appellant.

John Slattery, Elk Point, for defendant and appellee.

MILLER, Chief Justice.

Ben and Susan Honomichl, d/b/a Custom Sales (Custom Sales), brought action seeking to recover $8,881.48 for repairs performed on vehicles owned by Roger Modlin. Custom Sales appeals from the trial…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hepper v. Triple U Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Beka v. Lithium Corporation of AmericaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Klatt v. Continental Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Owens v. City of BeresfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API