Legal Opinion
Hurwitz v. Natruth Holding Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff as assignee of the Tompkins Park Holding Corporation. The plaintiff seeks among other relief, that the quitclaim deed dated June 3, 1939, covering the premises known as 216-218 East 118th Street, in the borough of Manhattan, New York City, and delivered to the defendant Nathan TJberstine by the Tompkins Park Holding Corporation on that day, be adjudged to have been a mortgage and that it be adjudged to be invalid and void.
At the time the deed was delivered to the defendant TJberstine, he held the second mortgage on the property, and there was in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Waring v. SmythNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
- Ensign v. . EnsignNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Herrick v. MalinCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Lewis v. PaynCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
- Carr v. FryeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnston v. De HaanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Hurwitz v. Natruth Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950