Legal Opinion
Barnes v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 6, 1986No. 85-19PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
In 1983, appellant was convicted of possession of heroin and given a suspended sentence for all but 90 days, with two years’ probation to follow. In January 1984, after appellant’s conviction in another case for distribution of heroin, the probation order in the first case was modified to coincide with the condition of probation imposed by the trial court in the second case: successful completion of the residential drug program at Second Genesis. 1 No objection was made to the modification 2 and no appeal was taken. In December 1984, appellant was expelled from…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Frost v. PEOPLES DRUG STORE, INCORPORATEDDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local 282, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- United States v. Robert D. TackettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992