Legal Opinion

JUSTICE - MALL, LLC, Employer-Appellant v. JAMIE BOLAND, Employee-Respondent, and DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 2016No. SD34250PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, J.

Justice—Mall, LLC (“Employer”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) that Jamie Boland (“Employee”) was not disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits as a result of being discharged for misconduct. See sections 288.030.1(23) and 288.050.2. 1 In a single point relied on, Employer contends “the Commission acted without or in excess of its powers under [section] 288.210, in that the Appeals Tribunal did not provide Employer a reasonable opportunity for a fair hearing before rendering its decision when the Appeals Tribunal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Howard v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. Mitchell v. KardeschSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  3. Hoover v. Community Blood CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. Aliff v. CodyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cedric A. Jackson v. True Manufacturing Co., and Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API