Legal Opinion

Holtzen v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1954No. 39,106PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action brought by the plaintiff to foreclose a subcontractor’s mechanic’s lien against real estate owned by the defendants Dunn. Certain defendants filed cross-petitions seeking foreclosure of their subcontractor’s mechanic’s liens. From a judgment foreclosing the liens of the plaintiff and two of the defendants later mentioned the defendants Dunn appeal.

Insofar as the cross-petition of The George W. Ultch Lumber Company is concerned we note that it was there alleged that the cross-petitioner was known to the public as above…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dolan Mercantile Co. v. Wholesale Grocery SubscribersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Home Lumber & Supply Co. v. McCurleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Skaggs v. CallabresiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Thomasson v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J. Walters Construction Co. v. Greystone South Partnership, L.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  2. DaMac Drilling, Inc. v. ShoemakeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986
  3. Minnesota Home Rebuilding & Repair Co. v. KraulikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API