Legal Opinion

Texas Co. v. Quelquejeu

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1920No. 3375PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the Canal Zone; Wm. H. Jackson, Judge. Action at law by C. Quelquejeu against the Texas Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

CLAYTON, District Judge.

The defendant in error, Quelquejcu, a merchant and resident of Panama, R. P. (and hereinafter called the plaintiff), sued the plaintiff in error, the Texas Company, a Texas corporation (hereinafter called the defendant), having its-principal place of business in New York City, for $3,000 damages for the breach of “an agreement in writing,” which the plaintiff alleged he made “with the defendant company, its agent or agents, in the Canal Zone, whereby the defendant, through its said representative or representatives, agreed to sell and deliver to plaintiff” certain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Schimmelpennich v. BayardSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  3. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  4. Wheeler v. McGuire, Scoggins & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  5. Bronson's v. ChappellSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Adams v. Barron G. Collier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Nowata Oil Syndicate v. Commercial Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Kansas Wheat Growers Ass'n v. RowanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Nichols v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API