Fenelli's Estate

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

But little need be added to what was said when the case was here before: 323 Pa. 49, 185 A. 758. After the record was returned, additional evidence was taken and the learned court below found that the beneficiaries of the trust did not know that the trust property was invested in the two mortgages or that title to them had been taken by the bank in its own name. The " beneficiaries, exercising the option vested in them (Yost’s Estate, 316 Pa, 463, 467, 175 A. 383) rejected the investments and insisted upon cash. The learned court below next took up the matter of…