Legal Opinion

Moore Shipbuilding Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 1, 1931No. K—72PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The question of interest on the overpayment. for 1918 and that portion of the overpayment for 1919 credited to the unpaid original tax and accrued interest for 1920 is governed by the decisions of this court in Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc., v. United States, 37 F.(2d) 965, 69 Ct. Cl. 70, and Andrews Steel Co. v. United States, 42 F.(2d) 573, 70 Ct. Cl. 235. Since the 1920 original tax which was satisfied by a portion of these overpayments and the interest on the 1920 tax became due and accrued prior to the date of the overpayments for 1918 and 1919, no interest is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wright v. BlakesleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Thome v. LynchDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1921
  4. Andrews Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mason v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API