Rodriguez v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
Vincent Rodriguez appeals his convictions for robbery with a firearm and grand theft. Due to the circumstantial nature of the case, which turned on the State’s identification evidence and Rodriguez’s credibility as a witness, we must reverse Rodriguez’s convictions and remand this case for a new trial because of prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel apparent on the face of the record.
Although Rodriguez raises a multitude of issues, we find one issue particularly dispositive and worthy of discussion. We agree that Rodriguez’s trial attorney gave…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- White v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eure v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Flint v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Stallworth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Mattox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Ortiz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.