Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lloyd v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 22, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1DissentClark, C. J.

Civil action tried upon these issues:

1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant company, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: "Yes."

2. Did the plaintiff, by his own negligence, contribute to his injury? Answer: "Yes."

3. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: "$500."

In apt time the defendant moved to nonsuit, which motion was overruled. From the judgment rendered, the defendant appealed. The plaintiff introduced evidence tending to prove that on 26 September, 1913, he had been in the employ of the railway company about nineteen months, doing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Brookshire v. Asheville Electric Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Bryan v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  4. Lassiter v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Luttrell v. . HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Thomas v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Poole v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Thomas ex rel. Thomas v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API