Legal Opinion

Hammer v. American United Life Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 5, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPortrum, J.

This is a suit by the beneficiary upon a policy of insurance allegedly issued and delivered to the insured in the amount of $1000. The defense is that the policy "shall not take effect until payment of the first premium and delivery of the policy during my (insured’s) lifetime and while in good health,” and that this provi- siou of the contract was not complied with. This defense is met by an insistence that the insured was in good health and had paid the premium at the date of the issuance of the policy, and while in fact the policy was not manually delivered during the sound health of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Wolfe v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925
  3. Warner v. MaroneyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  2. Gambill v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  3. April Hill v. Employee Resource Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  4. April Hill v. Employee Resource Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API