Legal Opinion

Snider v. Dobson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1896No. 772PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.

1Opinion of the Court

THAYER, Circuit Judge.

This suit was brought by John Dob-son and James Dobson, the appellees, against Samuel P. Snider, Austin F. Kelley, and the Union National Bank of Minneapolis, the appellants, to cancel two deeds conveying large tracts of pine land, situated in Hubbard and Cass counties, Minn., on the ground (hat they had been fraudulently contrived and executed. The deeds, which were absolute conveyances in fee simple, were executed by the defendant Samuel P. Snider on November 21, 1890, in favor of the defendant Austin F. Kelley, who was vice president of the Union National Bank, to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Furrer v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. McKinley v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  5. Stuart v. HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Order of United Commercial Travelers v. McAdamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Hussey v. Richardson-Roberts Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Board of Com'rs v. IrvineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  4. Barton Bros. v. Texas Produce Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  5. Gorham Mfg. Co. v. Emery-Bird-Thayer Dry-Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API