Hamilton v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1DissentCayton, Associate Judge
I am unable to agree with the views of my colleagues. I think the appeal should not be dismissed but should be considered on the merits and a reversal ordered.
*8901. Notice of appeal was timely, having been filed within five days from the judgment of conviction. Appellant should not he penalized for having filed it before the motion for new trial had been acted upon. Had a new trial been granted appellant could have withdrawn the notice of appeal. Congress re-established the right of appeal in these cases when it created this court a year ago, and we should not destroy that right by technical…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pettegrew v. PettegrewNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Stockwell v. C. C. & D. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Merchant v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- In re MattullathCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1912
- Nicholls v. AndersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.