Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 6, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson District Court. — Hon. H. C. Tea verse, Judge. Action for judgment on a promissory note executed by the defendant, and for the foreclosure of a mortgage on two tracts of land given to secure the same. The interveuor claims an interest in part of the lands as superior to the mortgage. The decree was entered for the plaintiff, from which the intervenor appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGiven, J.

The íaets in this case appear with but little conflict, and are, in substance, as follows : On 1. Title to real session-pñoi tice- and for some time prior to December 18, 1881, M. M. L. McReynolds held the legal title to a certain undivided fractional part of the northwest quarter of section 28, township 73, range 11, Jefferson county, in trust for his father, Solomon McReynolds. M. M. L. McReynolds sold, and .on •^December 13, 1881, conveyed, said interest to the defendant. The defendant, having purchased the other interest in said land from Matilda Gaston, did on the same day execute his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phillips v. BlairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  2. Nelson v. WadeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  3. McReynolds v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seibel v. BathWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Woodbury v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. Cooney v. CoppockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Clarkson v. McCoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Tomasi v. KelleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API