Legal Opinion

Ayers v. Swall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 21, 1916No. 6588PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Certiorari; from Colquitt superior court — Judge Thomas. March 5, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

Under the provisions of section 3706 of the Civil Code, in all cases where a cropper unlawfully sells or otherwise disposes of any part of the crop, or seeks to exclude the landlord from possession of the crops or any portion thereof, while the title thereto remains in the landlord, the landlord has the right “to repossess said crops by possessory warrant.” Landrum v. Smith, 1 Ga. App. 215 (57 S. E. 913). Under the special facts of this case, the cropper having sold the bale of cotton in question and the landlord’s right of possession thereof being unquestioned, the error, if any, in refusing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Landrum v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stifel & Sons Inc. v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API