City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement Board
Oregon Supreme Court
1DissentTongue, J.
I agree that, as a general rule, dissenting opinions should be restrained and respectful. It is difficult to do so, however, when, because of a purely fortuitous change in the membership of this court, there is now a majority which, by a margin of one vote, has prevailed by an opinion which:(1) Drastically upsets the long-existing balance of power between Oregon cities and the state legislature in the critical area of "home rule” by abandonment of the long-established concept that the "home rule” amendments to the Oregon Constitution granted to Oregon cities exclusive power to legislate as to…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.