SHOENTERPRISE CORPORATION v. Willingham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Defendant’s appeal relates solely to the last three installments which, according to the “Schedule of Payments,” were to become due May 10, 1958, May 10, 1959, and May 10, 1960. Defendant contends plaintiff’s action is also barred as to these three installments because plaintiff, by the exercise on June 20, 1957, of its acceleration option, caused the entire unpaid indebtedness evidenced by said note to become immediately due and payable.
“. . . where there is an acceleration clause giving the creditor the right upon certain contingencies to declare the whole sum due, the statute begins to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barbee v. . ScogginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
3Cited by6 opinions
- Christenbury Eye Ctr., P.A. v. Medflow, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- Quaranto v. SilvermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- United States Leasing Corp. v. Everett, Creech, Hancock & HerzigCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Vreede v. KochCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Outer Banks Ventures, Inc. v. Currituck Cnty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.