Legal Opinion

Wallace v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 20, 2013No. 4D13-92PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm, based upon State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla.1999), the trial court’s order barring the appellant from further pro se filings.

An order prohibiting pro se filings is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Ashe v. State, 106 So.3d 956, 957 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Hudson v. State, 95 So.3d 413, 414 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Generally, “a trial court’s decision does not constitute an abuse of discretion unless no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court.” McCray v. State, 71 So.3d 848, 862 (Fla.2011) (quoting Peede v. State, 955 So.2d 480, 489 (Fla.2007)) (internal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. McCray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  3. Peede v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  4. Ashe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Hudson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bryan Flowers v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API