Homan v. Liswell
New York Supreme Court
On error from the C. P. of the county of Schenectady. cited 2 Comen, 518, 605 and 612, note; 1 Serg. and Raicle, 411, per Tilghman, C. J. ; 1 Com. on Cont. S, 9, 10, 58, 59; Statute of 1824, sess. 47, ch. 238, s. 17, p. 289. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, which ■ was delivered by
1Opinion of the CourtSutherland, J.
Liswell sued Homan before a justice, anc] declared against him in case, for not returning an execution, which had been delivered to Homan, as a consta-kle, in favor of Liswell against Dudley and Tremple. Lis-well recovered, before the justice, the amount of the execution. Homan appealed to the common pleas, where Lis-well again recovers, and Homan brings his writ of error.
The execution bore date the 7iA of March, 1825 ; and on the 6th of April following, it was renewed by direction, and with the assent of LiswelVs agent, with a full knowledge of the time when it issued, and of all the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Curtis v. BlairMississippi Supreme Court · 1853
- Gorham v. WingMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Wehle v. . ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- McGuire v. BausherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Connecticut National Bank v. BaylesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.