Legal Opinion

Logan v. Oklahoma Mill Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 3, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the District Court of Kingfisher County; before C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge.'

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

G. H. Logan and E. C. Brennen bought two farms, and had the titles conveyed to themselves jointly. Druing the three or four years that they owned the land, Brennen farmed it to wheat, Logan paying for half of his time and half of the expenses. Brennen, each year, sold the wheat to the defendant in error, collecting the money for the same, and paid Logan his half, except for the year 19-01, which is in controversy in this action. The evidence, we think, also shows that the defendant was in possession of facts which would charge him with notice of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ryhiner v. FeickertIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Quackenbush v. SawyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Goell v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harrington v. Central States Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LenahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. F. C. Austin Manufacturing Co. v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  4. American Home Benefit Ass'n v. United American Benefit Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  5. M. B. Thomas Auto Sales, Inc. v. PickleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API