Legal Opinion · Dissent

Briggs Commercial & Development Co. v. Finley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1937No. Docket No. 119, Calendar No. 39,595Published

1DissentBittzel, J.

Charles W. Harrah of Detroit, a realtor, was heavily interested in subdivision property located either in or near the city of Detroit. The Union Trust Company, which subsequently became the Union Guardian Trust Company, acted as fiscal agent and trustee of his many subdivisions. It looked after the collection of payments on land contracts for the sale of lots in the subdivisions, and also made certain expenditures for Harrah. It made large loans to Harrah, which were partly evidenced by notes but in the main consisted of overdrafts on an open account. The trust company, for payment of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Awotin v. Atlas Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Richardson v. BuhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Knass v. Madison & Kedzie State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Nowel v. Equitable Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Commercial Nat. Bank v. PirieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API