Legal Opinion

Hespe v. Corning Glass Works, Inc.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided July 13, 1936No. 1893Published

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

The plaintiffs move for an order directing the defendant to serve answers to *596certain interrogatories. The complaint contains three alleged causes of action; The first charges that the defendant breached a certain agreement, and thereby the plaintiffs were deprived and will be deprived of profits and other income; the second, that the defendant breached the agreement aforesaid, in that defendant questioned the validity of certain patents and that thereby the plaintiffs were deprived and will be deprived of profits and other income; and, third, that by reason of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Schoenthal v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Buzard v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Carpenter v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Woodmanse & Hewitt Manuf'g Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API