Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Cole

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Birmingham City Court. Heard before Hon. C. C. Nesmith. Assumpsit by Susie H. Cole as administratrix, against N. F. Thompson. Defendant appeals from the judgment rendered against him: Counsel discuss the errors assigned, but without citation of authority.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, P. J.

It is not made to appear that the court was in error in admitting in evidence entries, shown to be in the handwriting of the plaintiff’s intestate, made in a book shown to have been kept by him in the conduct of his business. The bill of exceptions states that that book showed an account between the plaintiff’s intestate and the defendant, and that the defendant was indebted to said intestate, but does not set out the account as it appeared on the book, or state the amount of the balance shown by it. For anything appearing to the contrary, it may have embraced entries other than those for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elliott v. DyckeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Murray & Peppers v. DickensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Sands v. HammellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Peters v. NolenAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co. v. McCormackAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API