In re Gant
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HAYES, District Judge.
The moving creditor, W. N. Martin, contends that the subpoena is void, and that the service thereof is void, and moves to quash the service for these reasons, also to dismiss the petition, and, at the hearing and on brief, further contends that the petition is defective on its face to such an extent that it cannot confer jurisdiction in this court to order an adjudication thereon for the reason that it appears on the face of the petition that the claims are barred by the statute of limitation and are not, therefore, provable claims in bankruptcy.
The subpoena here is an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hill v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Meek v. Centre County Banking Co. Dale v. Same. Breeze v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Knox v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Concrete Steel Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- In re SteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Oakland Popcorn Supply, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1963