Legal Opinion

United States v. Dearborn Refining Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 31, 2011No. Civil Action 09-CV-13597PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARK A. GOLDSMITH, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Now before the Court is Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings or, alternatively, for summary judgment, based on the statute of limitations. The parties agree that the five-year limitations period under 28 U.S.C. § 2462 is applicable to this action, but disagree regarding

This is an action brought by the United States pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq., and the Federal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. National Rifle Ass'n of America v. MagawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Broadgate, Inc. v. Secretary, Department of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  2. United States of America et al. v. LabQ Clinical Diagnostics, LLC et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API