Legal Opinion

Indy Auto Man, LLC v. Keown & Kratz, LLC, and Dustin Stohler

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 2017No. Court of Appeals Case 29A02-1703-PL-551PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mathias, Judge.

Indy Auto Man, LLC (“1AM”) filed a complaint against Keown & Kratz, LLC (“K&K”), and Dustin Stohler (“Stohler”), alleging legal malpractice. K&K subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. IAM appeals and claims that there are genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment. We conclude sua sponte that the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to K&K was not a final appealable order. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Pacts and Procedural History

For purposes of our discussion, we need not set forth a detailed statement of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Georgos v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of the Adoption of O.R., N.R. v. K.G. and C.G.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Front Row Motors, LLC and Jerramy Johnson v. Scott JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Ramsey v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Martin v. Amoco Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Indy Auto Man, LLC v. Keown & Kratz, LLC, and Dustin StohlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Janice Lynn Buhrt v. Dennis Ray Buhrt (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Sandhu Petroleum Corp. No. 3 v. SBJ Petroleum No. 1, LLC SBJ Petroleum No. 3 LLC, Michael A. Jarard Corinth Bishop (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Thomas L. Imes, Maryanne W. Imes, and St. Anne 420N, LLC v. City of Madison (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. X.H. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API