Legal Opinion

In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-70107-2

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1986No. 18524-PRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Vice Chief Justice.

We granted review in order to determine whether a juvenile court may retain jurisdiction over a juvenile in non-commitment cases past the age of eighteen, and whether a juvenile court may use a juvenile’s inability to complete restitution before age eighteen as a basis for transferring the juvenile to adult court.

The facts giving rise to this case are in little dispute. The juvenile, along with several friends, was involved in a series of vehicle thefts in Pima County which often ended with the partial destruction of the vehicles. Damage was estimated to range from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Purcell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile No. J-86509Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Webb v. DixonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. McBeth v. RoseArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-96430Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal in Coconino County Juvenile Action No. J-9896Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In re the Appeal in Coconino County Juvenile Action No. J-10359Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. In re the Appeal in Yavapai County Juvenile Action No. J-9403Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  4. In Re the Appeal in Coconino County Juvenile Action No. J-9896Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Delinquency Action No. 89248-01Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API