Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ERROR to the Circuit Court for Racine County. The facts ar.e stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

OetoN, JV

The defendant, líale Roberts, was tried and found guilty on a complaint charging him with being the father of a child of which one Eva Maud Banbes was pregnant, and which, if born alive, would be a bastar’d. The complaining witness, the said Eva, testified that the child was the product of sexual intercourse between the said Ilaie Roberts and herself, which took place in September, 1890, about 12 o’clock at night, in a single square-boxed buggy in which they were riding on their way to her bóme from attending an opera in the city of Racine. The defendant, as a witness in his own…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bierbach v. Goodyear Rubber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hoyt v. City of HudsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Kellogg v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  4. State v. GingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  5. Van Doran v. ArmstrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. NestavalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. Schutz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Thomas v. PaulWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Suckow v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bodenheimer v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API