Legal Opinion

United States v. Menendez

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 28, 2015No. Cr. No. 15-155PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLS, Senior District Judge.

Defendants Robert Menendez and Salo-mon Melgen bring three motions to dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(3) based on purported violations of the First Amendment. After oral argument on September 17, 2015, the Court grants in part one of these motions and denies the others.

BACKGROUND

Defendants have been indicted in the District of New Jersey on charges of bribery and related crimes. Indictment (“Indict.”), ECF No. 1. The full procedural'and factual background of this case was discussed at length by the Court in its opinion on…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  2. People v. MoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API