Spinney v. R. M. Bradley & Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
It expressly appears from the bill of exceptions that the only issue raised is whether the trial judge should have granted the defendants' motions for directed verdicts. Henrietta Spinney seeks to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her on September 5, 1935, when a ceiling fell in the apartment that she and her husband, the other plaintiff, occupied in a building owned by the defendant Skinner and managed by the other defendant, hereinafter referred to as the company. William R. Spinney, who sues to recover for his consequential damages, entered *599the employ of the company in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shwartz v. FeinbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Shrigley v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Chambers v. DurlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Orcutt v. SignouinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Green v. PearlsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.