Legal Opinion
United States v. RGM Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 26, 2002No. Civ.A. 2:01CV719PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
MORGAN, District Judge.
The parties in this matter come before the Court for a non-jury trial seeking to resolve Clean Water Act (“CWA”) jurisdictional issues surrounding a 658 acre tract of land in Chesapeake, Virginia, known as the Edinburgh Planned Unit Development (the “property,”). 1 At the conclusion of the four day non-jury trial, the Court ruled from the bench that the property was not within the United States Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq (the “CWA”). This opinion and order further explains the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Newdunn AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. DeatonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Precon Development Corp. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- North Carolina Shellfish Growers Ass'n v. Holly Ridge Associates, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2003
- United States v. DeatonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Carabell v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.