Legal Opinion

Najjar v. Roland International Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 8, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Vice Chancellor.

Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint in this suit for failure to state a cause of action. Alternatively, as I view it, they have moved for summary judgment based upon a supporting factual affidavit. By agreement of counsel, this ruling deals only with the motion to dismiss, the consideration of which requires that the well-pleaded allegations of the complaint must be accepted as true for this limited purpose. Danby v. Osteopathic Hospital Ass’n of Delaware, Del.Ch., 101 A.2d 308 (1953), aff’d, Del.Supr., 104 A.2d 903 (1954).

The motion to dismiss is either…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  3. Danby v. Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,447 S. William Green v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. Danby v. Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Issen v. GSC Enterprises., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
  2. Roland International Corp. v. NajjarSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  3. PEOPLE'S COUNSEL FOR BALTIMORE CTY. v. Beachwood I Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Envirodyne Industries, Inc. v. American Express (In Re Envirodyne Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  5. Flynn v. Bass Bros. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API