Legal Opinion

Gage v. Abbott

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1881PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. W. H. BabUum, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

Under the old chancery practice, to maintain a bill to remove a cloud from a title it was essential the complainant should be in, and the party against whom the bill was filed out of, possession. Reed v. Tyler, 56 Ill. 288; Barnett v. Cline, 60 id. 205 ; Reed v. Reber, 62 id. 240; Lee v. Ruggles, id. 427.

But this is changed by the act of 1869, which allows such a bill to be filed “ whether the lands in controversy are improved or occupied, or unimproved and unoccupied.” Rev. Stat. 1874, p. 204, § 50.

Since that enactment we have held, there are only two cases, under our law, in which a party…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reed v. TylerIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Hamilton v. QuimbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Hardin v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lakeview Trust & Savings Bank v. EstradaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. Pankey v. OrtizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Monson v. KillIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. McGookey v. WinterIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Moore v. ShofnerOregon Supreme Court · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API