Gage v. Abbott
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. W. H. BabUum, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield
Under the old chancery practice, to maintain a bill to remove a cloud from a title it was essential the complainant should be in, and the party against whom the bill was filed out of, possession. Reed v. Tyler, 56 Ill. 288; Barnett v. Cline, 60 id. 205 ; Reed v. Reber, 62 id. 240; Lee v. Ruggles, id. 427.
But this is changed by the act of 1869, which allows such a bill to be filed “ whether the lands in controversy are improved or occupied, or unimproved and unoccupied.” Rev. Stat. 1874, p. 204, § 50.
Since that enactment we have held, there are only two cases, under our law, in which a party…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reed v. TylerIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Hamilton v. QuimbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Hardin v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lakeview Trust & Savings Bank v. EstradaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Pankey v. OrtizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- Monson v. KillIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- McGookey v. WinterIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
- Moore v. ShofnerOregon Supreme Court · 1902
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.