Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Brown

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 23, 1963No. 5-3163PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

The trial court ruled that appellant, James Harris Boyd, had no right to share equally with his half brother and his three half sisters in certain real estate—hence this appeal. The factual background is summarized below.

James Thomas Boyd and his wife, Mary Etta, were the parents of one son and three daughters, named respectively: William Bentley Boyd, Clara Lillian Rowe, Etta Blanche Eifling, and Minnie Lucy Brown. We will at times hereafter refer to these as the four heirs. Appellant was the son of the said James Thomas Boyd by a former wife. James Thomas Boyd…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Werbe v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Wallace v. RialesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Weston v. HilliardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cates v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Sellers v. West-Ark Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Simmons v. McCollumCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API