Aquamarine Associates v. Burton Shipyard, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentRobertson, Justice
I respectfully dissent. The majority affirms the lower court’s finding Aquamarine’s only evidence of expenses incurred in purchasing substitute vessels is hearsay. The testimony excluded is that of Tom Gilbert, the managing and operating partner of Aquamarine. Gilbert while testifying asked to refer to several charts prepared by his lawyer from an independent auditor’s report regarding the cost to cover. On voir dire Mr. Gilbert testified he had calculated the original figures used to prepare the audited financial statements. When asked if he could recall the numbers without the charts…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- J. A. Robinson Sons, Inc. v. WigartTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Lumpkin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.