Legal Opinion
Amos-Richia v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan
Decided July 1, 1907No. 8,473PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity. On motion to direct verdict for defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, District Judge
(orally). The motion here has been ably argued on both sides, and I can conceive nothing which has not been presented that would affect the conclusion to which I have arrived that would be- justified by the evidence. The motion is presented on two grounds: (1) That there is no evidence of the delivery of the policy sued upon. (2) There is no evidence of the payment of the first premium which the policy makes a condition precedent to its taking effect.
The facts are, briefly: That the policy of life insurance sued upon in which plaintiff is named as beneficiary, was found among papers of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gardner v. United Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Continental Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Columbian Nat. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935